"I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that
ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of
consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid
debate by claiming that the matter is
already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on
something or other, reach for your wallet because you're being had.
Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with
consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the
contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which
means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the
real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is
reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great
precisely because they broke with the consensus." - Michael Crichton
Did you not spot the self contradiction in this?
ReplyDelete"Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet because you're being had."
"results that are verifiable"
"What is relevant is reproducible results"
So If lots of scientists agree it is a conspiracy but science is about scientists agreeing and reproducing results.
Brilliant!