"I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that 
ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of 
consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid 
debate by claiming that the matter is 
already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on
 something or other, reach for your wallet because you're being had.
 Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with 
consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the 
contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which 
means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the
 real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is 
reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great 
precisely because they broke with the consensus."  - Michael Crichton
 
Did you not spot the self contradiction in this?
ReplyDelete"Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet because you're being had."
"results that are verifiable"
"What is relevant is reproducible results"
So If lots of scientists agree it is a conspiracy but science is about scientists agreeing and reproducing results.
Brilliant!