tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3540071429816533590.post7268395538614879790..comments2024-03-18T21:53:55.966-07:00Comments on Christian Apologetics UK: Forget Dawkins - Derren Brown is now the UK's most influential atheistfailedatheisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16176322877697068624noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3540071429816533590.post-38000697585500199942022-03-30T08:59:36.283-07:002022-03-30T08:59:36.283-07:00Christian Apologetics Uk: Forget Dawkins - Derren ...Christian Apologetics Uk: Forget Dawkins - Derren Brown Is Now The Uk'S Most Influential Atheist >>>>> <b><a href="http://urlme.top/akIXF?22" rel="nofollow">Download Now</a></b><br><br>>>>>> <b><a href="http://urlme.top/akIXF?56" rel="nofollow">Download Full</a></b><br><br>Christian Apologetics Uk: Forget Dawkins - Derren Brown Is Now The Uk'S Most Influential Atheist >>>>> <b><a href="http://urlme.top/akIXF?30" rel="nofollow">Download LINK</a></b><br><br>>>>>> <b><a href="http://urlme.top/akIXF?86" rel="nofollow">Download Now</a></b><br><br>Christian Apologetics Uk: Forget Dawkins - Derren Brown Is Now The Uk'S Most Influential Atheist >>>>> <b><a href="http://urlme.top/akIXF?38" rel="nofollow">Download Full</a></b><br><br>>>>>> <b><a href="http://urlme.top/akIXF?55" rel="nofollow">Download LINK</a></b> DU Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3540071429816533590.post-86533732368929180132020-02-24T12:34:05.953-08:002020-02-24T12:34:05.953-08:00I met Him! I talk to Him! He talks to me. To someo...I met Him! I talk to Him! He talks to me. To someone with a true relationship, its impossible to convince them otherwise.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05893883261539859515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3540071429816533590.post-17418639376697384062016-11-12T22:19:23.586-08:002016-11-12T22:19:23.586-08:00I'm going to assume that this reply is sarcasm...I'm going to assume that this reply is sarcasm. Burden of proof. If you want to convince someone that your fairytale is true you'll need to give more than the atheist "without evidence I don't believe it."Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14131177283008503934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3540071429816533590.post-13409228525554923762013-12-12T17:06:09.039-08:002013-12-12T17:06:09.039-08:00shame on anybody who thinks that christian's a...shame on anybody who thinks that christian's are just a bunch of egocentric maniacs with grandiose delusions, after all it is obvious to any non deluded person that the fact that science can't explain why there is something rather than nothing can have only one inescapable logical conclusion, and that is that it must follow from this that the whole universe and everything in it was created by a perfect and all knowing omnipotent being so that people like Dr. Craig can live forever .... completely reasonable when you think about !!! the logic is just so powerful and overwhelming that one can do nothing to escape it's rational grasp.... it is without doubt the best explanation for everything :)Erickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02818246341947603520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3540071429816533590.post-1294191542091749672013-04-25T03:53:10.760-07:002013-04-25T03:53:10.760-07:00"Brown ended the programme stating that he th..."Brown ended the programme stating that he thinks people believe in God "because it makes them happy". "<br /><br />One can easily argue back by saying that some people reject God "because it makes them happy." <br /><br />I would want to see Brown debate William Lane Craig on the existence of God. Craig would trounce Brown without even trying too hard.Anonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06023442566823507470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3540071429816533590.post-78912092781823588682012-11-28T03:48:05.403-08:002012-11-28T03:48:05.403-08:00Given that his explanation of the origins of God p...Given that his explanation of the origins of God plays right into the hands of Plantinga's "Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism," I wonder if he's heard Plantinga's argument and what he thinks of it. <br /><br />The claim, which is possibly more developed than it is presented here, seems to have a number of fallacies. If it's true because evolution caused it, and we can't fight our evolution, hasn't evolution also caused his atheism? Does that mean his atheism is untrue also? That's the tu quoque fallacy and violates the law of excluded middle. I also wonder, if what the beliefs evolution causes are not true, what he thinks of those that argue morality came from evolution.<br /><br />Interesting article, Justin. Thanks for posting.Stephenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12127415845769009991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3540071429816533590.post-30001736479294080212012-11-28T02:54:33.584-08:002012-11-28T02:54:33.584-08:00I think most rational people understand that no on...I think most rational people understand that no one will ever be able to prove that God or gods don't exist, due primarily to the difficulty of proving a negation. However, it also is becoming more and more clear that what we perceive as religious experience also tends to have potential explanations outside the realm of the supernatural. There is mounting neurological research that suggests that the global success of religion is a result of its hijacking of our fundamental attachment and placebo responses. While some may see the take away of this as evidence that God probably doesn't exist, I tend to see it more as evidence that religion works and will continue to be part of human culture for the foreseeable future.With Reasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03881624126689647262noreply@blogger.com